Looking for a Flowbite alternative? This page compares daisyUI and Flowbite, two popular UI component libraries. We are comparing features, size, efficiency and usage data to help you choose which component library is better for your next project.
daisyUI | Flowbite |
|---|---|
MIT License Open source MIT License | MIT License Open source MIT License |
ALL Frameworks daisyUI is framework agnostic and works everywhere | ALL Frameworks Flowbite is framework agnostic and works everywhere |
57 Unique components daisyUI has 61 components, 57 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same. | 55 Unique components Flowbite has 67 Components, 55 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same. |
35 Built-in Themes daisyUI has 35 themes | 2 Built-in Themes Flowbite has light and dark themes |
Yes Supports more than two themes daisyUI supports unlimited themes at the same time, allowing for dynamic theme switching. | No Supports more than two themes Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time |
0 JavaScript size daisyUI doesn't ship JavaScript to browsers | 132KB JavaScript size Imported JavaScript bundle size (minified) |
0 Dependencies daisyUI has no dependencies. It's immune to 3rd party vulnerabilities, dependency version mismatch, and deprecation issues. | 22 Dependencies Flowbite has 22 third-party dependencies. Using more third-party dependencies increases the risk of security vulnerabilities, compatibility problems, and long-term maintenance headaches from deprecated packages. |
0 Dependency size | 9.6MB Dependency size |
36000 GitHub stars In GitHub's top 400 repositories of all time | 8400 GitHub stars |
392000 Used by open source projects Based on GitHub's public repositories | 157000 Used by open source projects Based on GitHub's public repositories |
390000 NPM downloads Weekly downloads from NPM | 390000 NPM downloads Weekly downloads from NPM |
Yes CDN daisyUI CSS file is available on CDN | Yes CDN Flowbite CSS file is available on CDN |
Yes Semantic class names daisyUI uses semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework. | No Semantic class names Flowbite does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework. |
Yes Global customizations daisyUI provides tokens, root-level CSS variables and component-level CSS variables that let you adjust colors, sizes, spacing, radius, and other styles to match your design. | No Global customizations Flowbite requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization |
Yes works without Node.js daisyUI can be used as a standalone file, with Tailwind CSS standalone version. This is useful for projects without a Node.js environment. | No works without Node.js Flowbite requires a Node.js environment |
Yes No-build version daisyUI provides micro CSS files for each component | No No-build version Flowbite does not provide micro CSS files for each component |
Yes P3 colors daisyUI uses wide-gamut P3 colors | No P3 colors Flowbite does not use wide-gamut P3 colors by default |
Yes RTL support daisyUI supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts | Yes RTL support Flowbite supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts |
Yes Runtime CSS customization daisyUI uses CSS variables for design customization at runtime | No Runtime CSS customization Flowbite customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time |
Yes Native CSS nesting daisyUI uses native CSS nesting, reducing the CSS file size | No Native CSS nesting Flowbite doesn not use native CSS nesting |
22 Open GitHub issues As of April 2025 | 184 Open GitHub issues As of April 2025 |
1. Install daisyUI as a Node package:
npm i -D daisyui@latestpnpm add -D daisyui@latestyarn add -D daisyui@latestbun add -D daisyui@latestdeno i -D npm:daisyui@latest2. Add daisyUI to app.css:
@import "tailwindcss";
@plugin "daisyui";This comparison page is for informational purposes only and does not mean to criticize libraries or projects. Information is based on GitHub public data, NPM registry data and official documentation websites of the libraries. If you found any outdated information, please open a PR to update it. All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners.